audit

Due Diligence Red Flags in UAE M&A Transactions

Critical red flags to watch for during M&A due diligence in UAE. Financial, operational, legal, and cultural warning signs that could derail your deal or reduce valuation.

Due Diligence Red Flags in UAE M&A Transactions
F
Farahat & Co M&A Team
Due Diligence Specialists
January 3, 2026
18 min read
Table of Contents

Mergers and acquisitions in the UAE market require thorough due diligence to avoid costly mistakes. Based on hundreds of M&A transactions we've supported, these are the critical red flags that should raise concerns—or potentially stop a deal entirely.

Financial Red Flags

1. Revenue Recognition Irregularities

Warning Signs:

  • Revenue spikes at quarter-end or year-end (channel stuffing)
  • Significant sales to related parties
  • Revenue recognized before delivery or completion
  • High levels of sales returns or credits after period-end
  • Customers dispute invoiced amounts

Why It Matters: Revenue manipulation is the most common form of financial statement fraud. Inflated revenue directly impacts valuation multiples.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Analyze revenue by month to identify unusual patterns
  • Review large transactions near period-end
  • Confirm major sales with customers
  • Review credit note activity post-period
  • Examine contract terms for proper revenue recognition

Real Example: We discovered a SaaS company recognizing 3-year contracts as upfront revenue, inflating current year revenue by 185%. This reduced the acquisition price by AED 12M.

2. Working Capital Issues

Warning Signs:

  • Accounts receivable aging deteriorating
  • Significant bad debt write-offs
  • Inventory levels growing faster than sales
  • Accounts payable stretched beyond normal terms
  • Negative cash flow despite reported profits

Why It Matters: Working capital requirements often surprise acquirers post-close, requiring unexpected cash injections.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Calculate working capital ratios over 3+ years
  • Analyze receivable aging and collection patterns
  • Assess inventory obsolescence and turnover
  • Review supplier payment terms and relationships
  • Prepare working capital adjustment mechanism for purchase agreement

3. Unexplained Profitability

Warning Signs:

  • Profit margins significantly above industry averages
  • Gross margins improving while competitors struggle
  • Operating expenses unusually low for business size
  • One-time gains treated as recurring revenue
  • Capitalization of expenses that should be expensed

Why It Matters: If profits seem too good to be true, they probably are. Margins should be explainable and sustainable.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Benchmark margins against industry peers
  • Normalize earnings for one-time items
  • Review accounting policies for aggressive treatment
  • Analyze cost structure sustainability
  • Interview key customers on pricing and competition

4. Tax Compliance Concerns

Warning Signs:

  • Ongoing tax disputes or assessments
  • Large deferred tax balances without clear explanation
  • Inconsistencies between book and tax reporting
  • Missing VAT registration or returns
  • Transfer pricing documentation inadequate

Why It Matters: Tax liabilities transfer to acquirer in most UAE structures. Penalties can be substantial.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Review all tax returns for past 5 years
  • Check for ongoing FTA or Ministry audits
  • Assess VAT compliance and potential exposures
  • Review transfer pricing for related party transactions
  • Obtain tax clearance certificates pre-closing

Operational Red Flags

5. Customer Concentration

Warning Signs:

  • Top 3 customers represent >50% of revenue
  • Recent loss of major customer
  • Short-term contracts or no contracts with major customers
  • Customers are related parties or friends of owners
  • High customer churn rate

Why It Matters: Loss of a concentrated customer base can destroy business value overnight.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Interview top 10 customers
  • Review contract terms and renewal probability
  • Assess relationship dependency on current owner
  • Develop customer retention plan
  • Consider earnout tied to customer retention

6. Key Person Dependency

Warning Signs:

  • Founder/owner handles all major customer relationships
  • No documented processes or procedures
  • Key employees lack formal contracts
  • Technical knowledge concentrated in few individuals
  • Owner plans to leave immediately post-acquisition

Why It Matters: Key person departure can collapse business value if not properly transitioned.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Identify all key personnel and their roles
  • Negotiate retention agreements with key staff
  • Require owner transition period (6-12 months)
  • Document critical processes before closing
  • Assess cultural fit and employee retention risk

7. Supplier Relationships

Warning Signs:

  • Single-source suppliers for critical inputs
  • Supplier contracts in owner's personal name
  • Payment disputes or stretched payables
  • Supplier quality issues or delivery problems
  • No backup suppliers identified

Why It Matters: Supplier disruption can halt operations and damage customer relationships.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Meet with key suppliers
  • Review supplier contracts and terms
  • Assess supply chain risk and alternatives
  • Check for any supplier disputes
  • Ensure contracts are transferable

8. Litigation and Disputes

Warning Signs:

  • Ongoing lawsuits (as plaintiff or defendant)
  • Regulatory investigations or violations
  • Employee disputes or claims
  • Customer complaints or warranty issues
  • Intellectual property disputes

Why It Matters: Contingent liabilities can significantly exceed disclosed amounts and are often excluded from seller warranties.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Obtain legal representation letter from company attorneys
  • Search court records for undisclosed litigation
  • Review correspondence files for dispute evidence
  • Assess potential liability and reserve adequacy
  • Negotiate indemnification for undisclosed matters

9. Regulatory Compliance

Warning Signs:

  • Missing or expired licenses
  • Non-compliance with industry regulations (DHA, RERA, DFSA, etc.)
  • Environmental violations or concerns
  • Data privacy issues (personal data handling)
  • Safety violations or incidents

Why It Matters: Regulatory violations can result in business closure, fines, or criminal liability.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Verify all required licenses are current
  • Review regulatory correspondence and filings
  • Conduct compliance audit for applicable regulations
  • Assess environmental liabilities
  • Check labor law compliance (wage protection, end of service)

10. Intellectual Property Issues

Warning Signs:

  • Critical IP not properly registered
  • IP ownership unclear (company vs. personal)
  • Third-party IP claims or infringements
  • Employee IP assignment agreements missing
  • Use of unlicensed software or content

Why It Matters: IP disputes can eliminate competitive advantage and expose buyer to infringement claims.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Conduct IP audit (trademarks, patents, copyrights)
  • Verify registration and ownership
  • Review employee and contractor IP agreements
  • Search for potential infringement issues
  • Assess freedom to operate

Structural and Ownership Red Flags

11. Corporate Structure Complexity

Warning Signs:

  • Multiple entities with unclear purpose
  • Offshore companies without business justification
  • Circular ownership structures
  • Frequent changes in corporate structure
  • Nominee shareholders or beneficial owners unclear

Why It Matters: Complex structures often hide tax avoidance, asset diversion, or ownership disputes.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Map complete corporate structure
  • Identify all beneficial owners
  • Understand business purpose of each entity
  • Review intercompany transactions
  • Simplify structure pre-closing if possible

Warning Signs:

  • Significant transactions with related parties
  • Above or below market pricing with related parties
  • Assets owned personally but used by business
  • Management fees or services from related entities
  • Loans to/from shareholders

Why It Matters: Related party transactions may not continue post-acquisition, affecting profitability.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Identify all related parties
  • Review all related party transactions
  • Assess market pricing and normalize earnings
  • Determine which transactions will continue
  • Negotiate transition of necessary assets/services

HR and Cultural Red Flags

13. Employee Issues

Warning Signs:

  • High employee turnover (>25% annually)
  • Unresolved labor disputes
  • Inadequate employee contracts
  • Missing end of service provisions
  • Unlawful visa arrangements

Why It Matters: Employee issues can result in labor court claims, mass resignations, or Ministry penalties.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Review employment contracts for key staff
  • Calculate end of service liability
  • Check WPS (Wage Protection System) compliance
  • Assess employee satisfaction through interviews
  • Verify visa and labor card status

14. Cultural Misalignment

Warning Signs:

  • Very different management styles
  • Incompatible business ethics or values
  • Geographic/cultural disconnect
  • Conflicting strategic visions
  • Communication style differences

Why It Matters: Cultural misalignment is a leading cause of M&A failure, even when financials look good.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Spend time with management team before closing
  • Assess cultural fit through site visits
  • Discuss vision and values alignment
  • Plan integration approach
  • Consider cultural due diligence assessment

Financial Controls and Systems

15. Internal Control Weaknesses

Warning Signs:

  • No segregation of duties
  • Owner override of controls common
  • Weak IT security and access controls
  • Manual processes with no documentation
  • No internal audit function

Why It Matters: Control weaknesses create fraud risk and integration challenges.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Assess control environment
  • Test key controls
  • Identify control gaps requiring remediation
  • Budget for control improvements
  • Consider control deficiencies in price

16. IT and Data Issues

Warning Signs:

  • Outdated or unsupported systems
  • No disaster recovery or backup plan
  • Data integrity issues
  • Cybersecurity vulnerabilities
  • Poor system documentation

Why It Matters: IT integration is often the most expensive and time-consuming aspect of M&A.

Due Diligence Actions:

  • Conduct IT systems assessment
  • Review cybersecurity measures
  • Assess integration complexity and cost
  • Test data accuracy and completeness
  • Plan for system migration or upgrades

Due Diligence Best Practices

1. Start Early and Be Thorough

Don't rush due diligence to meet arbitrary deadlines. Allow 4-8 weeks minimum for comprehensive review.

2. Use Experienced Advisors

Engage specialists: auditors for financial DD, lawyers for legal DD, technical experts for operational DD.

3. Focus on Value Drivers

Prioritize due diligence on what drives value: customers, products, key employees, competitive advantages.

4. Verify Everything

Trust but verify. Don't rely solely on seller representations—independently confirm key facts.

5. Model Multiple Scenarios

Prepare best case, base case, and worst case financial models based on DD findings.

6. Negotiate Based on Findings

Use DD findings to:

  • Renegotiate price
  • Adjust deal structure
  • Require seller representations
  • Establish escrow for contingencies
  • Walk away if red flags too severe

Red Flags Severity Matrix

Deal Breakers (Walk Away):

  • Systematic fraud or financial misstatement
  • Criminal activity or money laundering
  • Fundamental business model flaw
  • Insolvency or bankruptcy risk
  • Irreconcilable cultural misalignment

Major Issues (Renegotiate Price/Terms):

  • Significant customer concentration
  • Material litigation exposure
  • Working capital requirements 2x expected
  • Key employee departure likely
  • Regulatory non-compliance requiring major remediation

Minor Issues (Require Remediation Plan):

  • Control weaknesses
  • IT system updates needed
  • Process documentation gaps
  • Employee contract updates
  • Minor compliance issues

Comprehensive Due Diligence Checklist

Use this checklist to ensure nothing is missed during your due diligence process:

Scroll to see all columns →

CategoryKey Items to ReviewPriority
Financial• 3-5 years audited financials<br>• Monthly management accounts<br>• Aged receivables/payables<br>• Cash flow projections<br>• Tax returns & assessmentsHigh
Legal• Trade licenses & registrations<br>• Material contracts<br>• Litigation search<br>• IP registrations<br>• Employment agreementsHigh
Operational• Customer contracts & concentration<br>• Supplier agreements<br>• Key employee retention<br>• Process documentation<br>• Capacity utilizationHigh
Regulatory• Industry-specific compliance<br>• VAT registration & returns<br>• Corporate tax status<br>• Labor law compliance<br>• Environmental permitsMedium
IT/Systems• System architecture<br>• Data security & backups<br>• Software licenses<br>• Integration requirements<br>• Cybersecurity assessmentMedium
Strategic• Market position & competition<br>• Growth opportunities<br>• Synergy potential<br>• Cultural fit<br>• Integration complexityMedium

Real-World Case Studies

Case Study 1: E-Commerce Business - Deal Terminated Due to Critical Red Flags

Target Profile:

  • Industry: Online retail (fashion & accessories)
  • Revenue: AED 45M (claimed)
  • EBITDA: AED 9M (20% margin)
  • Asking Price: AED 54M (6x EBITDA multiple)
  • DD Timeline: 6 weeks

Initial Attraction: Strong online presence, growing market, impressive financials, experienced management team.

Red Flags Discovered During DD:

Finding #1: Revenue Recognition Fraud (Critical)

  • Seller claimed AED 45M annual revenue
  • DD Analysis revealed:
    • AED 8.2M in fake orders (18% of revenue): Orders placed internally then "returned" after period-end
    • AED 4.1M in channel stuffing (9%): Forced sales to distributors with liberal return rights
    • AED 2.7M double-counted (6%): Same transactions recorded in multiple entities
  • Actual sustainable revenue: ~AED 30M (33% lower)

Finding #2: Working Capital Crisis

  • Balance sheet showed AED 12M inventory
  • Physical count and aging analysis revealed:
    • AED 5.8M obsolete inventory (prior season stock unsellable)
    • AED 2.1M customer returns not yet processed
    • AED 3.2M inventory at third-party warehouses could not be located
  • Actual inventory value: ~AED 900K (92% write-down needed)

Finding #3: Customer Concentration & Dependency

  • Top customer represented 43% of legitimate revenue
  • Customer interviews revealed:
    • Contract expiring in 3 months with no renewal commitment
    • Customer developing in-house alternative
    • Pricing below market (relationship-based discount)

Finding #4: VAT Non-Compliance

  • VAT returns filed but significant discrepancies found:
    • Input VAT claimed on personal expenses (AED 280K)
    • Output VAT not declared on related party sales (AED 420K)
    • Estimated FTA exposure: AED 1.2M in taxes + penalties

Financial Impact:

Scroll to see all columns →

MetricAs PresentedAfter DDVariance
RevenueAED 45MAED 30M-33%
Gross Margin45%32%-13 pts
EBITDAAED 9MAED 3.2M-64%
Working CapitalAED 6M(AED 2.1M)-135%
Contingent LiabilitiesAED 0AED 1.2MN/A

Adjusted Valuation:

  • Original asking: AED 54M (6x EBITDA)
  • Adjusted EBITDA: AED 3.2M
  • Adjusted multiple: 4x (risk discount)
  • Revised value: AED 12.8M
  • Contingent liabilities: (AED 1.2M)
  • Maximum justified offer: AED 11.6M (78% discount from ask)

Outcome: Buyer terminated negotiations after seller refused to address findings or adjust price. Target company entered insolvency 8 months later.

Lesson: Financial statement fraud is more common than most buyers assume. Always verify revenue with independent confirmation, physical counts, and third-party validation.


Case Study 2: Manufacturing Business - Successful Acquisition with Risk Mitigation

Target Profile:

  • Industry: Food manufacturing (snacks & confectionery)
  • Revenue: AED 85M
  • EBITDA: AED 12.8M (15% margin)
  • Asking Price: AED 70M (5.5x EBITDA)
  • DD Timeline: 8 weeks

Red Flags Identified:

Issue #1: Customer Concentration (Medium Risk)

  • Top 3 customers = 58% of revenue
  • Largest customer (retail chain) = 34% alone
  • Contracts were annual with 90-day termination clause

Risk Mitigation:

  • Negotiated 3-year supply agreements with top customers before closing
  • Obtained customer testimonials and commitment letters
  • Built earn-out tied to customer retention (Year 1: 80% retention required)
  • Reduced base price by AED 6M, with earn-out potential of AED 8M

Issue #2: Facility Lease Risk (Medium Risk)

  • Main production facility on lease expiring in 18 months
  • Landlord indicated 40% rent increase at renewal
  • Relocation would cost ~AED 4.5M and disrupt operations

Risk Mitigation:

  • Buyer negotiated 5-year lease extension at 15% increase (vs. 40% proposed)
  • Obtained option to purchase facility at pre-agreed price
  • Reduced purchase price by AED 2.5M to account for lease risk

Issue #3: Working Capital Seasonality (Low Risk)

  • Working capital varied AED 8M to AED 14M seasonally
  • Seller financials showed AED 9M WC (low point)
  • Closing planned at high-WC season (would require AED 5M additional funding)

Risk Mitigation:

  • Established working capital adjustment mechanism with target of AED 11M
  • Agreed to 60-day post-closing true-up
  • Structured transaction with seller note to fund seasonal WC needs

Issue #4: Key Employee Retention (High Risk)

  • Production manager (20 years) planned to retire within 6 months
  • 2 senior sales executives contemplating departure
  • No succession planning or knowledge transfer documented

Risk Mitigation:

  • Negotiated 18-month retention bonuses for 5 key employees (total: AED 900K)
  • Production manager agreed to 12-month consulting arrangement post-retirement
  • Implemented knowledge transfer program 90 days pre-closing
  • Reduced purchase price by AED 1.5M for transition risk

Final Deal Structure:

Scroll to see all columns →

ComponentAmountTerms
Base Purchase PriceAED 59MCash at closing (reduced from AED 70M)
Working Capital Adjustment+AED 2MBased on closing WC true-up
Seller NoteAED 5M3-year, 4% interest (seasonal WC funding)
Earn-out (Customer Retention)Up to AED 5M80% customer retention Year 1
Earn-out (Performance)Up to AED 3MEBITDA targets Years 1-2
Total Potential ValueAED 74MIf all earn-outs achieved

Post-Acquisition Results (18 Months):

  • Revenue grew to AED 94M (+11% organic growth)
  • Customer retention: 96% (earn-out achieved)
  • EBITDA improved to AED 14.2M (17% margin)
  • All key employees retained
  • Facility lease extended successfully

Total Value:

  • Buyer paid: AED 66M (base + WC adjustment + earnouts achieved)
  • Current valuation: AED 105M (7.4x current EBITDA)
  • Buyer gain: AED 39M (59% return) in 18 months

Lesson: Red flags don't necessarily kill deals. Proper risk identification, quantification, and mitigation through deal structure can turn risky acquisitions into successful outcomes.


Case Study 3: SaaS Company - Hidden Liabilities Discovered

Target Profile:

  • Industry: HR Software (SaaS)
  • ARR: AED 18M
  • EBITDA: AED 6.5M (36% margin)
  • Asking Price: AED 54M (3x ARR / 8.3x EBITDA)
  • DD Timeline: 5 weeks

Critical Red Flags:

Issue #1: Revenue Quality Concerns

  • ARR calculation included multi-year prepayments as annual recurring
  • 28% of "ARR" was from 3-year contracts paid upfront (not renewable for 2+ years)
  • Churn analysis showed 18% annual customer churn (industry standard: 8-12%)
  • Adjusted ARR: AED 13.2M (27% lower)

Issue #2: Intellectual Property Ownership Gaps

  • Core software developed by 3 co-founders
  • IP assignment agreements never executed (critical oversight)
  • 1 founder planning to leave post-acquisition
  • Risk: Founder could claim IP ownership and create competing product

Resolution:

  • Required all founders to execute comprehensive IP assignment agreements before closing
  • Added non-compete clauses (3 years, GCC region)
  • Escrow AED 5M of purchase price until IP assignments irrevocable (6-month escrow period)

Issue #3: Data Privacy Non-Compliance

  • Platform processed personal data for 400+ UAE clients
  • No GDPR compliance (despite 15% of customers EU-based)
  • No data processing agreements with customers
  • No cybersecurity insurance
  • Estimated remediation cost: AED 1.2M + potential fines

Issue #4: Technical Debt & Scalability

  • Infrastructure assessment revealed:
    • Monolithic architecture (difficult to scale)
    • No automated testing (high bug risk)
    • Single AWS region (no redundancy/disaster recovery)
    • 60% of codebase undocumented
  • Estimated re-platforming cost: AED 2.8M over 12 months

Valuation Adjustment:

Scroll to see all columns →

ItemOriginalAdjustmentAdjusted
ARRAED 18M-AED 4.8MAED 13.2M
ARR Multiple3.0x-0.3x (risk)2.7x
Gross ValuationAED 54MN/AAED 35.6M
Less: Technical Debt--AED 2.8MAED 32.8M
Less: Compliance--AED 1.2MAED 31.6M
Less: Risk Escrow--AED 5MAED 26.6M
Cash at Closing--AED 26.6M
Escrow Release-+AED 5M(if no IP issues in 6 months)

Final Negotiated Terms:

  • Purchase price: AED 32M (41% reduction from ask)
  • Structure: AED 27M at closing + AED 5M escrow (6 months) pending IP confirmation
  • Founders to remain for 24 months (retention bonuses tied to ARR growth)
  • Seller to fund data privacy compliance remediation (AED 1.2M)

Outcome:

  • Acquisition completed at adjusted valuation
  • IP assignments executed and escrow released after 6 months
  • Technical debt being addressed over 18-month roadmap
  • Current ARR: AED 16.8M (27% growth in 12 months post-acquisition)
  • Buyer satisfied with adjusted-price acquisition

Lesson: Technology companies often have hidden technical and IP risks. Specialized technical due diligence and legal review are essential for SaaS acquisitions.


Due Diligence Process: Phase-by-Phase Guide

Phase 1: Preliminary Assessment (Week 1)

Objective: Determine if full DD is warranted

Activities:

  • Review teaser/CIM (Confidential Information Memorandum)
  • Analyze summary financials
  • Assess strategic fit
  • Identify obvious red flags
  • Estimate valuation range

Go/No-Go Decision Point

Phase 2: Planning & LOI (Week 1-2)

Objective: Secure access and plan DD approach

Activities:

  • Submit Letter of Intent (non-binding)
  • Execute NDA
  • Assemble DD team (advisors, specialists)
  • Prepare DD request list (100-200+ items)
  • Establish data room access
  • Schedule management presentations

Phase 3: Document Review (Week 2-5)

Objective: Analyze all materials in data room

Activities:

  • Financial analysis (3-5 years detailed)
  • Legal document review
  • Contract analysis (customers, suppliers, employees)
  • Compliance verification
  • IT systems assessment
  • Operational deep-dive

Phase 4: Verification & Site Visits (Week 3-5)

Objective: Validate information independently

Activities:

  • Management interviews (full day sessions)
  • Customer reference calls (top 10-20 customers)
  • Supplier discussions
  • Physical site inspections
  • Inventory counts
  • IT infrastructure review

Phase 5: Issues Resolution (Week 5-6)

Objective: Address red flags and concerns

Activities:

  • Prepare DD findings report
  • Quantify risks and financial impacts
  • Negotiate remediation or price adjustments
  • Update financial model
  • Revise valuation
  • Prepare final recommendations

Phase 6: Final Negotiations (Week 6-8)

Objective: Complete transaction or walk away

Activities:

  • Price renegotiation based on DD findings
  • Structure adjustments (earnouts, escrows, warranties)
  • Finalize SPA (Sale & Purchase Agreement)
  • Closing conditions satisfaction
  • Final approvals (board, lenders)

Due Diligence Team & Costs

Typical DD Team Composition:

Scroll to see all columns →

AdvisorRoleTypical Cost (UAE)
Lead Financial AdvisorCoordinate DD, financial analysis, valuationAED 80K-250K (deal size dependent)
Legal CounselContracts, compliance, SPA draftingAED 60K-200K
Auditor/AccountantFinancial verification, QoE (Quality of Earnings)AED 40K-120K
Tax AdvisorTax compliance, structuring, liabilitiesAED 25K-80K
IT/Tech SpecialistSystems review, cybersecurity, integrationAED 30K-100K
Industry ExpertOperational, commercial DDAED 20K-60K (if needed)
HR/CompensationEmployee matters, benefit plansAED 15K-40K (if needed)

Total Typical DD Cost:

  • Small deals (< AED 20M): AED 100K-250K (1.5-2% of deal value)
  • Mid-sized deals (AED 20-100M): AED 250K-600K (0.8-1.2%)
  • Large deals (> AED 100M): AED 600K-1.5M+ (0.5-0.8%)

ROI on Due Diligence: Based on our case studies above, proper DD identified:

  • Case 1: Saved buyer from AED 42M loss (deal terminated)
  • Case 2: Reduced purchase price by AED 11M, structured AED 8M earnout
  • Case 3: Reduced price by AED 22M and avoided IP litigation

Average ROI on DD investment: 8:1 to 30:1

Red Flag Response Framework

When You Discover Red Flags:

Step 1: Categorize Severity

  • Critical: Fraud, insolvency, fatal flaws → Likely walk away
  • Major: Material risks, large financial impact → Renegotiate significantly
  • Medium: Addressable issues, moderate impact → Adjust price/terms
  • Minor: Remediable, low impact → Require remediation plan

Step 2: Quantify Financial Impact

  • Direct cost to remediate
  • Revenue/EBITDA impact
  • Risk-adjusted probability
  • Insurance/escrow requirements

Step 3: Develop Mitigation Strategy

Scroll to see all columns →

Risk TypeMitigation Options
FinancialPrice reduction, working capital adjustment, earnout structure
LegalIndemnities, insurance, escrow, seller warranties
OperationalTransition services agreement, retention bonuses, process documentation
CustomerContract renegotiation pre-close, earnouts tied to retention
EmployeeRetention agreements, stay bonuses, cultural integration plan
ComplianceRemediation plan with seller funding, regulatory clearances pre-close

Step 4: Renegotiate or Walk

  • Present findings objectively with supporting evidence
  • Propose revised terms based on quantified risks
  • Be prepared to walk if seller unreasonable
  • Remember: No deal is better than a bad deal

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How long should due diligence take for a UAE acquisition?

Typical timelines:

  • Small transactions (< AED 10M): 3-4 weeks minimum
  • Mid-sized (AED 10-50M): 6-8 weeks
  • Large/complex (> AED 50M): 10-16 weeks

Don't rush DD to meet artificial deadlines. In our experience, deals rushed through DD in < 3 weeks have 3x higher failure rate post-acquisition.

Critical factors affecting timeline:

  • Data room preparation quality (organized vs. chaotic)
  • Seller responsiveness to questions
  • Complexity of business (single vs. multiple entities/locations)
  • Regulatory requirements (licensed industries take longer)
  • Transaction complexity (asset vs. share purchase, cross-border elements)

Best practice: Build 25-30% buffer into DD timeline for unexpected issues or delayed responses.


2. What percentage of deals fail due diligence in the UAE market?

Based on our 2024 M&A analysis of UAE transactions:

  • 12% of deals terminated during or immediately after DD
  • 67% resulted in price adjustments (average -18% from initial ask)
  • 21% completed at original terms (typically very clean targets)

Common reasons for termination:

  1. Financial misrepresentation (38% of terminations)
  2. Undisclosed litigation/liabilities (22%)
  3. Customer/revenue concentration worse than disclosed (18%)
  4. Regulatory compliance issues (12%)
  5. Cultural misalignment/key person risk (10%)

Key insight: Sellers who provide transparent, well-organized data rooms and proactively disclose issues have 2.3x higher completion rate than those who hide problems.


3. Should I use the seller's auditor for due diligence, or hire independent advisors?

Always hire independent advisors. Here's why:

Conflict of Interest:

  • Seller's auditor has existing relationship and future audit fees at stake
  • May be reluctant to highlight issues that reflect poorly on their audit work
  • Owes duty to seller (their client), not to you

Scope Differences:

  • Annual audit focuses on financial statement fairness (materiality ~1-5% of financials)
  • Due diligence requires deeper dive into quality of earnings, working capital, off-balance sheet items
  • DD investigates operational and commercial matters beyond audit scope

Independence & Objectivity:

  • Independent advisor owes duty solely to buyer
  • No relationship bias or pressure
  • Can provide objective "walk away" recommendation if needed

Our recommendation:

Scroll to see all columns →

ServiceAdvisorWhy
Financial DDIndependent auditor/advisorObjectivity, deeper scope, buy-side focus
Legal DDIndependent legal counselNo conflict, buyer protection
Tax DDIndependent tax advisorIdentify seller liabilities, structure optimization
Quality of EarningsIndependent forensic accountantFraud detection, earnings normalization

Cost difference: Marginal (5-10% more) compared to risk of biased/incomplete DD.


4. What are the most commonly missed red flags in UAE acquisitions?

Based on our post-mortem analysis of failed acquisitions, these are the top 10 most commonly missed red flags:

1. Related Party Transactions (missed in 34% of cases)

  • Personal expenses run through business
  • Assets owned personally but used by business
  • Sales/purchases from owner-related entities at off-market prices
  • Impact: Profitability not sustainable post-acquisition

2. Customer Concentration & Relationship Dependency (29%)

  • Revenue tied to owner's personal relationships
  • Key customers not under formal contracts
  • Customer satisfaction dependent on specific individual
  • Impact: Revenue collapse post-acquisition

3. Regulatory Compliance Gaps (26%)

  • Licenses not current or transferable
  • VAT compliance issues (most common: input VAT on non-business expenses)
  • Labor law violations (WPS, gratuity provisions)
  • Impact: Penalties, business interruption, remediation costs

4. Working Capital Manipulation (24%)

  • AR deliberately collected before closing (inflates cash, depletes future collections)
  • AP stretched to improve working capital at closing date
  • Inventory build-up near closing to inflate asset value
  • Impact: Post-closing cash shortfall requiring unexpected funding

5. Undisclosed Contingent Liabilities (22%)

  • Pending litigation not disclosed
  • Tax assessments under negotiation
  • Warranty claims or customer disputes
  • Impact: Unexpected liabilities post-closing

6. Key Employee Retention Risk (21%)

  • No assessment of employee departure probability
  • Key employees not consulted about acquisition
  • No retention arrangements in place pre-closing
  • Impact: Mass resignations in first 6 months

7. IT System & Data Issues (19%)

  • Legacy systems requiring immediate replacement
  • No disaster recovery or data backups
  • Data integrity issues in financial systems
  • Impact: Operational disruption, unexpected IT investment

8. Intellectual Property Gaps (17%)

  • IP not properly registered or assigned to company
  • Third-party IP infringements
  • Employee IP agreements missing
  • Impact: Loss of competitive advantage, litigation risk

9. Quality of Earnings Adjustments (16%)

  • One-time gains treated as recurring
  • Expenses deferred or capitalized improperly
  • Owner compensation below/above market
  • Impact: Earnings 15-30% lower than represented

10. Cultural & Integration Complexity (14%)

  • Underestimating cultural differences
  • Integration costs and timeline underestimated
  • Systems/process incompatibility
  • Impact: Failed integration, value destruction

Prevention: Engage experienced advisors who know what to look for beyond the obvious. Budget 0.5-1.5% of deal value for comprehensive DD.


5. How do I know if a red flag is a deal-breaker vs. negotiable?

Use this Red Flag Decision Framework:

Category 1: DEAL BREAKERS (Walk Away)Fraud or systematic financial misstatement

  • Evidence of intentional falsification
  • Multiple fraudulent schemes
  • Management integrity compromised

Insolvency or fundamental business model failure

  • Liabilities exceed assets significantly
  • Negative cash flow with no path to profitability
  • Business model obsolete or uncompetitive

Criminal activity or money laundering

  • Evidence of illegal operations
  • Regulatory investigation for serious violations
  • Sanction violations or bribery

Irreconcilable cultural misalignment

  • Fundamental values conflict
  • Integration assessed as impossible
  • Key stakeholders oppose acquisition

Category 2: MAJOR ISSUES (Renegotiate 20-40%) ⚠️ Material financial misrepresentation

  • Example: Revenue overstated by 25%+
  • Response: Price reduction + earnouts based on actual performance

⚠️ Significant litigation/liability exposure

  • Example: Lawsuit seeking damages > 15% of EBITDA
  • Response: Escrow, indemnities, insurance

⚠️ Customer concentration > 50%

  • Example: Top 2 customers = 60% of revenue
  • Response: Customer contracts pre-closing + retention-based earnout

⚠️ Regulatory non-compliance requiring major remediation

  • Example: AED 2M+ in remediation costs
  • Response: Price reduction + seller-funded remediation

Category 3: MODERATE ISSUES (Adjust 10-20%)Control weaknesses or operational inefficiencies

  • Example: Weak IT controls, manual processes
  • Response: Price reduction for remediation costs + transition period

Key person dependency

  • Example: Founder critical to operations
  • Response: Extended transition + retention bonuses + earnouts

Working capital higher than disclosed

  • Example: Need AED 3M more WC than expected
  • Response: Working capital adjustment mechanism in SPA

Category 4: MINOR ISSUES (Require Remediation Plan) Process/documentation gaps

  • Example: Contracts not centrally filed, processes undocumented
  • Response: Seller to remediate pre-closing or post-closing plan

Minor compliance issues

  • Example: Some employee contracts outdated
  • Response: Remediation checklist as closing condition

Decision Matrix:

Scroll to see all columns →

Impact on EBITDAProbabilitySeverityResponse
> 50%HighCriticalWalk away
30-50%HighMajorRenegotiate 30-40%
15-30%MediumMajorRenegotiate 15-25%
5-15%MediumModerateAdjust 5-15%
< 5%LowMinorRemediation plan

Key principle: No single issue should exceed 15-20% of deal value unless deal-breaker. Multiple issues compound—three 10% issues = potential 25-30% adjustment, not just 30%.


6. What should be included in a comprehensive due diligence report?

A professional DD report should include these sections:

Executive Summary (2-3 pages)

  • Transaction overview
  • Summary of key findings
  • Red flags by severity
  • Valuation impact summary
  • Recommendation (proceed/renegotiate/walk away)

Financial Analysis (15-20 pages)

  • Historical performance (3-5 years)
  • Quality of earnings adjustments
  • Working capital analysis
  • Cash flow assessment
  • Balance sheet review
  • Financial projections evaluation
  • Normalized EBITDA calculation

Commercial Due Diligence (10-15 pages)

  • Market analysis and positioning
  • Customer analysis (concentration, contracts, satisfaction)
  • Supplier relationships and risks
  • Competitive landscape
  • Revenue quality assessment
  • Growth drivers and risks

Operational Assessment (8-12 pages)

  • Business model and operations
  • Key processes and systems
  • Capacity and scalability
  • Facilities and equipment
  • Supply chain analysis
  • Key personnel and organization

Legal & Regulatory (10-12 pages)

  • Corporate structure and ownership
  • Material contracts review
  • Litigation and disputes
  • Regulatory compliance
  • Intellectual property
  • Employment matters

Tax Review (5-8 pages)

  • Tax compliance history
  • Outstanding assessments
  • Tax structuring opportunities
  • Contingent tax liabilities

IT & Systems (5-8 pages)

  • IT infrastructure
  • Cybersecurity assessment
  • Data integrity
  • Integration requirements
  • Technical debt

Risk Assessment (5-7 pages)

  • Risk register (all identified risks)
  • Probability and impact analysis
  • Mitigation strategies
  • Quantification of exposures

Valuation Impact (3-5 pages)

  • Original valuation
  • Adjustments based on findings
  • Revised valuation range
  • Deal structure recommendations

Appendices

  • Detailed financial schedules
  • Key contracts summary
  • Customer/supplier lists
  • Management interview notes
  • DD request list and responses
  • Legal searches and certifications

Total report length: 60-100 pages for mid-sized transactions

Deliverable timeline: 1-2 weeks after DD completion for comprehensive report


7. Can I rely on the seller's representations, or should I verify everything independently?

Always verify independently. Here's why:

Sellers have incentive to present best case:

  • Maximize sale price
  • Downplay problems
  • Overstate opportunities

Representations may be:

  • Technically accurate but misleading
  • Outdated (prepared months before DD)
  • Based on incomplete information
  • Optimistically interpreted

"Trust but verify" approach:

Scroll to see all columns →

Seller RepresentationIndependent Verification Method
"Revenue is AED 50M"• Analyze by month for patterns<br>• Confirm samples with customers<br>• Review sales contracts<br>• Reconcile to bank deposits
"Top customer happy"• Direct customer interview<br>• Review contract and pricing<br>• Check for disputes/complaints<br>• Assess contract renewal probability
"No litigation"• Court record searches<br>• Review correspondence files<br>• Interview legal counsel<br>• Check regulatory databases
"All taxes paid"• Review all tax returns<br>• Check for assessments<br>• Verify payments made<br>• Obtain tax clearance certificate
"Inventory worth AED 5M"• Physical count (sample or full)<br>• Aging analysis<br>• Obsolescence assessment<br>• Compare to recent sales

Our 2024 analysis:

  • 89% of seller-provided data rooms had at least one material discrepancy when independently verified
  • 34% of financial representations required adjustment after verification
  • 67% of customer/supplier information was incomplete or outdated

Best practice: Verification typically adds 15-20% to DD cost but reduces post-closing surprises by 70-80%. Well worth the investment.


Conclusion

Due diligence red flags don't always mean you should walk away from a deal—but they should inform your decision-making, pricing, and risk mitigation strategies. The key is to:

  1. Identify issues early through comprehensive, independent due diligence
  2. Quantify the impact on valuation and future performance
  3. Develop mitigation strategies through deal structure, warranties, and remediation plans
  4. Negotiate appropriately based on risk-adjusted valuation
  5. Walk away when red flags indicate fundamental problems

At Farahat & Co, we've conducted due diligence on 200+ UAE M&A transactions across all industries and deal sizes. Our comprehensive due diligence process identifies red flags early, quantifies risks accurately, and helps clients make informed acquisition decisions that protect their investment.

Our Due Diligence Services Include:

  • Financial and quality of earnings analysis
  • Commercial and operational assessment
  • Tax compliance and structuring review
  • Legal and regulatory due diligence coordination
  • IT systems and cybersecurity review
  • Valuation and deal structure advisory

Contact us for expert due diligence services that protect your investment and ensure successful transactions.

Important Disclaimer

The information provided in this article reflects the regulatory environment as of 2026. Laws and regulations in the UAE are subject to change. This content is for general information only and does not constitute professional legal or financial advice. We recommend consulting with a qualified auditor or legal advisor for your specific situation.

Share this guide

Continue Reading

Explore more insights and guides from our team.

Real-world forensic audit investigation revealing how systematic fraud was detected, investigated, and resolved. Learn the red flags, investigation methodology, and recovery process.
Dec 22, 2025
12 min read
Learn the key indicators that your business would benefit from internal audit services, including rapid growth, control weaknesses, and fraud risk factors.
Dec 14, 2025
19 min read
Comprehensive overview of updated audit requirements in UAE for 2025, including new Ministry of Economy regulations, reporting standards, and compliance deadlines.
Nov 25, 2025
17 min read
Comprehensive guide to selecting the right audit firm for your UAE business. Learn the 10 critical factors including credentials, industry expertise, pricing, and technology.
Dec 29, 2025
19 min read

Ready to Upgrade Your Financial Compliance?

Join 28,000+ businesses who trust Farahat & Co for their audit, tax, and advisory needs. Ministry-approved, reliable, and just a call away.